Johnson v. Chisholm

Citations

• 115 F. 625
• 53 C.C.A. 123
• 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4234

Syllabus

<p>1. Patents — Anticipation—Pbocess bob Hulling Peas.</p> <p>The Chisholm patent, No. 421,244, for a method of hulling peas, Is void for anticipation by the process disclosed in the Faure French patent of May 15, 1883, and the first certificate of addition thereto. Gray, Circuit Judge, dissenting.</p> <p>8. Same — Invention.</p> <p>The Scott patent, No. 499,397, for a process of gathering and hulling green peas from the vines, claim 2, is void for lack of patentable novelty, in view of the prior art</p> <p>8. Same — Pea-Hulling Machine.</p> <p>The Scott & Chisholm patent No. 500,299, for a pea-hulling machine, claims 1 to 6, are void for lack of patentable invention, in view of the prior art.</p> <p>4 Same.</p> <p>The Scott patent, No. 387,318, for a machine for hulling and separating green peas, claim 5, construed, and held not infringed.</p>