Johnson v. Chicago Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that motion for directed verdict was properly denied where there was “conflicting testimony presented concerning whether plaintiff was inside the crosswalk when the collision occurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hawkes v. Casino Queen, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-01-29· cited 28×
• Yoder v. Ferguson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-03-06· cited 28×
• New v. PACE SUBURBAN BUS SERVICE
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-01-27· cited 18×
• Sullivan v. Edward Hospital
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-11-27· cited 8×
• Hawkes v. Casino Queen, Inc. Corrected Opinion
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-01-29

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Skelton v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-05-17· cited 42×
• Pharr v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-09-30· cited 36×
• Johnson v. Colley
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1986-02-06· cited 25×
• Santos v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-05-10· cited 21×
• Huston v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-01-19· cited 15×
• Johnson v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-05-13· cited 8×
• Wilson v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-09-29· cited 7×