Skip to main content
· 10/19/2004

Johnson v. Chicago Plastering Institute Health and Welfare Fund

Citations

  • 341 F. Supp. 2d 1011
  • 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2851
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21018
  • 2004 WL 2378362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting similar alter ego theory that parent company marketed to and used subsidiary’s in-state contacts to its benefit, which was supported primarily by press release articles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conlon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.