· 2/11/1987
Johnson v. Cherry
Citations
- 726 S.W.2d 4
- 30 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 209
- 1987 Tex. LEXIS 293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that deed imputed as a mortgage was “null and void”
- reversing judgment of appellate court which had held that “[wjithout an enforceable obligation or debt, the deed could not be converted into a mortgage”
- true nature of instrument is resolved by ascertaining intent of parties as disclosed by contract, attending circumstances or both
- “Restoration or an offer to restore consideration received by one seeking to cancel a deed is a condition precedent to maintaining a suit for cancellation of an instrument.”
- “Restoration or an offer to restore consideration received by one seeking to cancel a deed is a condition precedent to maintaining a suit for cancellation of an instrument.”
- “Restoration or an offer to restore consideration received by one seeking to cancel a deed is a condition precedent to maintaining a suit for cancellation of an instrument.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spears
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.