Skip to main content
· 2/11/1987

Johnson v. Cherry

Citations

  • 726 S.W.2d 4
  • 30 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 209
  • 1987 Tex. LEXIS 293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that deed imputed as a mortgage was “null and void”
  • reversing judgment of appellate court which had held that “[wjithout an enforceable obligation or debt, the deed could not be converted into a mortgage”
  • true nature of instrument is resolved by ascertaining intent of parties as disclosed by contract, attending circumstances or both
  • “Restoration or an offer to restore consideration received by one seeking to cancel a deed is a condition precedent to maintaining a suit for cancellation of an instrument.”
  • “Restoration or an offer to restore consideration received by one seeking to cancel a deed is a condition precedent to maintaining a suit for cancellation of an instrument.”
  • “Restoration or an offer to restore consideration received by one seeking to cancel a deed is a condition precedent to maintaining a suit for cancellation of an instrument.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spears

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.