Johnson v. Cella

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the issue of constructive notice 19 involved “a conflict in the evidence to be resolved by the trier of facts”
• upholding finding 4 of constructive notice of rights where appellants knew of existence of buried pipes but failed to investigate and “would not take the trouble to see where [they] went” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).