Johnson v. Cascade Funding Mtge. Trust 2017-1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that \a facial challenge must fail where the statute has a plainly legitimate sweep\
• concluding that “a facial challenge must fail where the statute has a plainly legitimate sweep”
• holding that when only injunctive relief is sought, only one plaintiff with standing is required
• holding that the Democratic Party had standing so it did not need to determine whether any other plaintiff had standing
• holding that photo identification requirement imposed “a limited burden” (citation omitted)
• noting that there was “no evidence of any [in-person voter] fraud actually occurring in Indiana at any time in its history”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).