Johnson v. Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where a doctor was directly billing, rather than billing through a covered facility as his contract required, his actions were not covered by the United States
• citing, among other cases, United States v. Knowles, 147 F. Supp. 19, 20–21 (D.D.C. 1957) (“[T]he status of a member of a grand jury may not be questioned except for lack of legal qualifications.”)
• applying \stream of benefits\ theory to § 201(b) bribery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).