Johnson v. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• restriction of property “for residential use only” did not mean that the property was to be used only for single-family residences; that interpretation would add to and thus be inconsistent -with the express terms of the covenant
• court may not adopt construction that is inconsistent with express terms of contract
• covenant allowing “residential use only” does not prohibit use of property for apartment purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Yogman v. Parrott
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-05-30· cited 323×
• Swaggerty v. Petersen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-12-28· cited 33×
• Brown v. American Property Management Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-03· cited 12×
• Johnson v. Campbell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1972-05-24· cited 5×
• Yogman v. Parrott
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-08-21· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Aldridge v. Saxey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-12-22· cited 14×
• Rodgers Et Ux v. Reimann Et Ux
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1961-04-19· cited 14×