Skip to main content

Johnson v. Brooks

Citations

  • 567 So. 2d 34
  • 1990 WL 136861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that numerous harassing phone calls, some containing threats, were not sufficient to support trial court’s decision to grant injunctive relief
  • holding that where there was no evidence of repeat violence, statutory elements are not met
  • holding that numerous harassing phone calls, some containing threats, could not support trial court’s decision to grant injunctive relief
  • holding that several harassing phone calls alone, even containing threats, were not sufficient for the trial court to grant injunctive relief
  • holding that numerous harassing phone calls, some containing threats, were not sufficient to support trial court’s decision to grant injunctive relief
  • holding that telephonic threats did not constitute incidents of violence because there was no evidence defendant did any act to create a fear of imminent violence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.