Johnson v. Archer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery was not a crime of violence under Section 924(c)
• holding that a conspiracy to commit a crime of violence such as Hobbs Act robbery is not itself a crime of violence in light of United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019)
• recognizing that § 924(c)(3)(A) was not at issue in Davis
• explaining that Davis explicitly rejected any reliance on the “particular murderous violence of [the defendant’s] robbery conspiracy” under both § 924(c)(3)(A) and (B)
• stating that Hobbs Act Robbery “can be identified as a crime of violence 3We review de novo the District Court’s denial of Walker’s motion to dismiss Count Three. United States v. Greenberg, 835 F.3d 295, 305 (2d Cir. 2016
• applying United States v. Davis, — U.S. — , 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).