Johnson, T. v. CCP Phila. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the corroborating evidence must raise only an inference of truth as to the essential facts admitted.”
• listing a number of factors to consider in determining whether asportation of a victim is “more than an incidental or momentary detention”
• “Edwards [was] adopted in M.R.E. 305[(f) (version in force in 2002, now M.R.E. 305(c)(2), (4))].”
• “Edwards [was] adopted in M.R.E. 305[ (f) (version in force in 2002, now M.R.E. 305(c)(2), (4))].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).