Johnson-Snodgrass v. KTAO, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding notice of dismissal pursuant to Rule 165a(2) did not provide notice to plaintiff of trial court’s intent to dismiss under inherent power
• holding notice of dismissal pursuant to Rule 165a(2) did not provide notice to plaintiff of trial court’s intent to dismiss under inherent power
• holding notice of dismissal pursuant to Rule 165a(2) did not provide notice to plaintiff of trial court’s intent to dismiss under inherent power
• sustaining appellant’s issue “that the trial court could not exercise its inherent authority to dismiss her suit because the dismissal notice indicated only that the case was subject to dismissal for noncompliance with the supreme court’s time standards [under Rule 165a(2
• when evidence established dismissal was not authorized under Rule 165a(1) or (2), “any dismissal of [plaintiff’s] suit under Rule 165a constituted an abuse of discretion” requiring reversal and remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).