Skip to main content
· 11/30/2006

Johnson Real Estate Investments, LLC v. Aqua Industrials, Inc.

Citations

  • 639 S.E.2d 589
  • 282 Ga. App. 638
  • 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 3818
  • 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 1501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • fee-shifting language of agreement did “not limit recovery only to the person who brings the action, but rather allows recovery to the prevailing party. Thus, the language contemplates that the party defending the action could prevail and would be entitled to recover attorney fees.”
  • fee-shifting language of agreement did “not limit recovery only to the person who brings the action, but rather allows recovery to the prevailing party. Thus, the language contemplates that the party defending the action could prevail and would be entitled to recover attorney fees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Blackburn, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.