Johnson, Michael Derrel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a district court's grant of a permanent injunction for a claim brought under 29 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1)(B)
• \Tackett and Reese are consistent with the approach we have taken for decades.\
• “While contract interpretation differs from statutory interpretation in some ways, this principle applies in both: the actions of courts have given the phrase a meaning that parties knowledgeable in the relevant areas of law are presumed to use.”
• “The principle that contracts should be interpreted to avoid rendering language superfluous or redundant is not absolute. Rather, it is a preference to be employed to the extent possible given the range of reasonable meanings that can be ascribed to the contractual language.”
• reading this as the holding of Reese and Tackett

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).