D.C. Circuit· 3/17/2006

Johnson, Lamar v. Quander, Paul A.

Citations

440 F.3d 489
370 U.S. App. D.C. 167
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 6601
2006 WL 662748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that accessing an individual’s stored DNA records after the individual has completed his sentence is not a search for Fourth Amendment purposes
concluding that plaintiffs appeal of his due process claims were “without merit and do not warrant separate discussion”
listing cases from the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits
“[A]ccessing the DNA snapshots contained in the CODIS database does not independently implicate the Fourth Amendment.”
affirming grant of motion to dismiss Fourth Amendment challenge to future use of DNA sample, reasoning that “[n]othing in the record suggests such future testing is imminent, nor can we analyze its invasiveness until it appears”
Act helps “solve past and future crimes,” in furtherance of government’s “duty ... to protect the public”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Brown, Griffith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.