Johnson, et.al. v. Williamson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the relevant law was “clearly established” in the post-October 1994 time frame for purposes of defendant’s claim of qualified immunity
• holding that there need not “be a case presenting the exact fact situation at hand in order to give parties notice of what constitutes actionable conduct”
• concluding state agent’s attempts to obtain sexual favors in exchange for favorable permit application and compliance determinations amount to abuse of his governmental authority for the purpose of this own sexual gratification and thus violate the Equal Protection Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).