Johnson Electric Supply Co. v. Spence
Citations
- 29 Ohio C.C. Dec. 99
- 28 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 44
Syllabus
<p>AUTOMOBILES— EXEMPTIONS.</p> <p>1. Automobile not “Implement” Exempt from Execution.</p> <p>An automobile used to carry about an electrician, his tools and supplies, and at times to transport himself and family, is not an “implement” within the meaning of the statute exempting certain articles from levy and execution.</p> <p>2. Automobile not Exempt in Lieu of Homestead when Owner and Wife Own Homestead even though Mortgaged and Conveyed to Mortgagee.</p> <p>An automobile cannot be claimed as exempt in lieu of a homestead where the owner and his wife were the owners *of a homestead and living therein at the time the levy was made, notwithstanding the property was mortgaged for more than it was worth and was conveyed to one of the mortgagees after the levy was made.</p> <p>[Syllabus approved by the court.]</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- credible evidence in record indicated that the cause of the claimant’s ailment was non-work-related and the commission declined to credit claimant's evidence regarding work-related causes
- credible evidence in record indicated that the cause of the claimant's ailment was non-work-related and the commission declined to credit claimant's evidence regarding work-related causes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gorman, Hamilton, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.