Johns v. United Bank & Trust Co. of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the district court’s finding that impermissible retaliation was the actual motivating factor” for a disciplinary transfer “is a factual determination that we review for clear error” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that “the district court’s finding that impermissible retaliation was the actual -5- motivating factor” for a disciplinary transfer “is a factual determination that we review for clear error” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding inmate must show that impermissible retaliation was actual motivating factor for transfer
• “[T]ruthfully answering questions concerning a misconduct investigation against a correctional officer is undoubtedly quite consistent with legitimate penological objectives.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]ruthfully answering questions concerning a misconduct investigation against a correctional officer is undoubtedly quite consistent with legitimate penological objectives.” (internal quota- tion marks omitted)
• no constitutional right to remain in particular institution; prison officials may transfer inmate for any non-retaliatory reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).