Johns v. Johns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• nonresident spouse’s participation in UCCJA custody proceeding did not constitute submission to the personal jurisdiction of the court for child support determination
• “The purpose of RURESA [the predecessor statute to UIFSA] is to create an economical and expedient means of enforcing support orders for parties located in different states. The act is remedial in nature and should be liberally construed so that its purpose is achieved.”
• \The purpose of RURESA [the predecessor statute to UIFSA] is to create an economical and expedient means of enforcing support orders for parties located in different states. The act is remedial in nature and should be liberally construed so that its purpose is achieved.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Damico v. Damico
  California Supreme Court· 1994-05-09· cited 34×
• Franklin v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Franklin
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-04-14· cited 18×
• Formanack v. Formanack
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-02-02· cited 9×
• Van Dyke v. Van Dyke
  Fairfax County Circuit Court· 1998-12-02· cited 1×
• Clifton Franklin v. CW,D.S.S.,D.C.S.E., M. Franklin
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-04-14

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cass v. Lassiter
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-05-06· cited 24×
• Scott v. Sylvester
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1979-08-30· cited 12×