Johns v. Jaeb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding agreement to advance funds constituted usurious loan and noting that defendant’s intent not to charge usury was immaterial “since the intent of the parties is presumed to be reflected in the documents which they signed”
• finding agreement to advance funds constituted usurious loan and noting that defendant’s intent not to charge usury was immaterial “since the intent of the parties is presumed to be reflected in the documents which they signed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).