Skip to main content
· 9/25/2007

Johns Hopkins University v. Nath

Citations

  • 238 S.W.3d 492
  • 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 7681
  • 2007 WL 2767675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Ejmployment of ten employees who reside in Texas does not show purposeful availment because their residency is based on their own choice or the requirement of a third party.”
  • A [E]mployment of ten employees who reside in Texas does not show purposeful availment because their residency is based on their own choice or the requirement of a third party. @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wanda McKee Fowler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.