Johnny Gregory v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “much of the research and drafting done during [the pleadings stage] was necessary to the case for later, successful plaintiffs, and should not be discounted entirely”
• remarking that Trails Act litigation is “complex” and “highly specialized,” and that “[v]ery few firms in the country have the willingness and the expertise to take on these” cases
• remarking that Trails Act litigation is “complex” and “highly specialized,” and that “[v]ery few firms in the country have the willingness and the expertise to take on these” cases
• remarking that Trails Act litigation is “complex” and “highly specialized,” and that “[v]ery few firms in the country have the willingness and the expertise to take on these” cases
• remarking that Trails Act litigation is “complex” and “highly specialized,” and that “[v]ery few firms in the country have the willingness and the expertise to take on these” cases
• dividing the case into five time periods for the purpose of analyzing appropriate reductions to hours billed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).