Skip to main content
· 6/10/1983

Johnnie Pegues v. Morehouse Parish School Board

Citations

  • 706 F.2d 735
  • 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 210
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26845
  • 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[t]he preclusive effect of the law of the case and res judicata doctrines presents a pure legal question”
  • observing that “the preclusive effect of the law of the case and res judicata doctrines presents a pure legal question . . .”
  • explaining that law of the case does not apply to dicta
  • “It is axiomatic that an issue not raised in the trial court will not be considered on appeal unless it involves a pure question of law, and our refusal to address it would result in a miscarriage of justice.”
  • “It is axiomatic that an issue not raised in the trial court will not be considered on appeal unless it involves a pure question of law, and our refusal to address it would result in a miscarriage of justice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Politz, Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.