Johness F. SWINDLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, as Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the opinion of a non-examining physician “is entitled to little weight and taken alone does not constitute substantial evidence to support an administrative decision”
• stating that “the - 10 - ALJ must consider a claimant’s impairments in combination”
• stating that the ALJ’s determination relating to the claimant’s side effects was proper where the claimant did not complain about side effects and the record did not disclose concerns about side effects to the doctors examining the claimant
• stating that “the ALJ must consider a claimant’s impairments in combination”
• stating that “the ALJ must consider a claimant’s impairments in combination”
• stating that “the ALJ must consider a claimant’s impairments in combination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).