Skip to main content
· 10/5/1981

Johnakin v. Pennsylvania

Citations

  • 454 U.S. 875
  • 102 S. Ct. 350
  • 70 L. Ed. 2d 182
  • 50 U.S.L.W. 3249
  • 1981 U.S. LEXIS 3795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court could properly dismiss conspiracy count since damages were already covered in underlying tort
  • finding that certain video game features are “as a practical matter indispensable, or at least standard, in the treatment of a given [idea]”.
  • creating new Illinois torts is something for the Illinois courts or Illinois legislature to do rather than the federal courts
  • citing, Wainright Securities, Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp., 558 F.2d 91, 94 (2d Cir.1977)
  • discussing the objectives of the Sunday closing law and quoting section 51:194 C
  • describing scenes a faire as “incidents, characters or settings which are as a practical matter indispensable, or at least standard ... in the treatment of a given topic”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.