· 10/5/1981
Johnakin v. Pennsylvania
Citations
- 454 U.S. 875
- 102 S. Ct. 350
- 70 L. Ed. 2d 182
- 50 U.S.L.W. 3249
- 1981 U.S. LEXIS 3795
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that district court could properly dismiss conspiracy count since damages were already covered in underlying tort
- finding that certain video game features are “as a practical matter indispensable, or at least standard, in the treatment of a given [idea]”.
- creating new Illinois torts is something for the Illinois courts or Illinois legislature to do rather than the federal courts
- citing, Wainright Securities, Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp., 558 F.2d 91, 94 (2d Cir.1977)
- discussing the objectives of the Sunday closing law and quoting section 51:194 C
- describing scenes a faire as “incidents, characters or settings which are as a practical matter indispensable, or at least standard ... in the treatment of a given topic”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.