Skip to main content
· 2/17/1897

John Wigmore v. Buell

Citations

  • 116 Cal. 94
  • 47 P. 927
  • 1897 Cal. LEXIS 515

Syllabus

<p>Ejectment—Damages—Amendment of Answer—Counterclaim—Trespass oe Cattle upon Contiguous Premises.—In an action of ejectment to recover the possession of a tract of land, with damages for its detention, and for the value of the rents and profits, a proposed amendment to the answer, setting forth a claim for damages in consequence of the cattle and stock of the plaintiffs running and grazing upon lands of the defendant contiguous to the demanded premises, does not constitute a defense to the action, nor a proper subject matter of counterclaim, and such proposed amendment is properly disallowed.</p>

Judges: Searls

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.