John W. Farries v. Stanadyne/chicago Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that prior, materially unchanged version of statute permitted a veteran to 6 No. 07-2709 “commence an action without having fees or court costs” imposed
• noting that “the fading of key witnesses' memories during the nine-year period prior to filing suit was a proper ground for a finding of prejudice to the defendant.”
• notice should be given, but where there is no actual surprise, lack of notice not reversible error
• laches barred plaintiff’s VRRA claim where he waited at least six years to file a lawsuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).