John W. Blasecki, Jr. v. City of Durham, North Carolina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]henever the state restricts the right of assembly . . . the state must have a compelling interest in the subject Zick, Recovering the Assembly Clause, 91 TEX. L. REV. 375, 377 (2012) (“[T]he freedom of assembly was transformed into a right of association.”
• “[W]henever the state restricts the right of assembly . . . the state must have a compelling interest in the subject matter to justify abridgment, and the scope of the abridgment itself must not be greater than reasonably necessary to serve the state interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).