John W. Bentley v. Sunset House Distributing Corp., Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If the patents are invalid as a matter of law, the [trial] court not only had the power, but it was its duty, to grant the motion for judgment n. o. v.”
• “To show that some secondary meaning existed, it was necessary for Bentley to establish that the public . . . regard[s] its product as emanating . . . from a single, though anonymous maker.”
• “To show that some secondary meaning existed, it was necessary for Bentley to establish that the public . . . regard[s] its product as emanating . . . from a single, though anonymous maker.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).