John v. Young v. Agb Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing opposition asserting that exclusivity 7 Trademark Act § 1(a)(3)(A) (“[T]he person making the verification [on an application filed under Trademark Act Section 1(a
• dismissing opposition asserting that exclusivity 7 Trademark Act § 1(a)(3)(A) (“[T]he person making the verification [on an application filed under Trademark Act Section 1(a
• \The linguistic and functional similarities between the opposition and cancellation provisions ... mandate that we construe the requirements of these provisions consistently.\
• “The linguistic and functional similarities between the opposition and cancellation provisions . .. mandate that we construe the requirements of these provisions consistently.”
• where an opposer failed to plead a ground for refusal, that unpleaded was “therefore was not before the Board”
• “We agree that this issue is not before us because it was not pleaded by Young in his Notice of Opposition, and therefore was not before the Board.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).