John v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although a tribal child support order need not match the format of a support order issued by the Alaska courts, it must, at a minimum, be concrete enough to be enforceable.”
• “Given the plain language of John I and John II, it is clear that we believed that the custody and support matters were separate and that the transfer of the former to the (continued...
• “We conclude that the superior court correctly ruled that child support had never been referred to the tribal court and that the division could enforce the court’s child support order. This disposes of the case and makes it unnecessary to resolve the additional jurisdictional issues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2016-03-25· cited 2×
• Hicks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2016-06-24· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nevada v. Hicks
  Supreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 439×
• John v. Baker
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1999-09-08· cited 61×
• Bennett v. Bennett
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2000-07-28· cited 47×
• State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. Wetherelt
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1997-01-24· cited 18×
• John v. Baker
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2001-08-31· cited 15×