Skip to main content
· 3/16/1903

John T. Hardie's Sons & Co. v. Scheen

Citations

  • 110 La. 612
  • 34 So. 707
  • 1903 La. LEXIS 684

Syllabus

<p>SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE — CONTRACT AGAINST PUBLIC POLICY — ACTION ON NOTE — DEFENSES.</p> <p>1. Courts will not lend their aid for the enforcement of contracts against good morals or against public policy; and a contract by which one creditor of an embarrassed debtor, in order to lure the other creditors to settle their claims at a reduced figure, outwardly agrees to the same reduction, while secretly exacting full payment, is of that character; and notes in pursuance of it cannot he enforced, though given after the other creditors had been settled with on the reduced basis.</p> <p>2. The maker of the notes may plead the illegality of the agreement in pursuance of which they were given.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no duty to develop record where the record contained adequate evidence from which the ALJ assessed the plaintiff’s RFC which included the plaintiff’s treatment notes and four medical opinions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Provosty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.