John T. Coffee and Meg Coffee v. Cutter Biological and Miles Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Connecticut's human tissue and blood shield statute’s use of “blood bank” to include commercial manufacturers and distributors
• interpreting Connecticut’s human tissue and blood shield statute’s use of “blood bank” to include commercial manufacturers and distributors
• transfer of blood not a “sale” but a service; therefore, not within purview of § 52-572m et seq.
• “[T]he district court was informed by appellees’ counsel that Mr. Coffee had died. Because his death had not yet been reflected on the record, the district court elected to continue treating Mr. Coffee as a party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).