Skip to main content
· 4/3/2012

John Sutter v. Oxford Health Plans

Citations

  • 675 F.3d 215
  • 2012 WL 1088887
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6618

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the parties disputed their intent regarding class arbitration, the arbitrator had authority to order class arbitration “so long as it [stood] on a contractual basis”
  • starting that vacatur can only be based upon one of the four factors
  • explaining that legal error is not a basis for vacatur of arbitrator’s decision
  • aff'd 569 U.S. 564 , 133 S.Ct. 2064 , 186 L.Ed.2d 113 (2013)
  • “[M]indful of the strong federal policy in favor of commercial arbitration, we begin with the presumption that the award is enforceable.”
  • “[M]indful of the strong federal policy in favor of commercial arbitration, we begin with the presumption that the award is enforceable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuentes, Chagares, Pogue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.