John Simeonoff v. Todd Hiner and Clare Hiner,in Personam and the F/v Saga, Opinion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting appellant’s Rule 52(a) 24 challenge because his arguments “are merely observations that the district court’s 25 award for past and future economic damages are lump sum awards” and “[l]ump 26 sum damage awards are not per se insufficient under Rule 52(a)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).