Skip to main content
· 4/16/2024

John Schmeeckle v. Hamilton County Tennessee

Syllabus

This is the petitioner's second petition to recuse based on the same allegations. Therefore, we affirm the trial court's dismissal.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that it is vital that the district court make findings of fact on curtilage, which the circuit court may review on appeal
  • leaving open the issue of \the force of dicta \ when a court acts in its supervisory capacity
  • leaving open the issue of “the force of dicta ” when a court acts in its supervisory capacity
  • stressing that the suspect was left “free to run for over a half hour”
  • finding that the protective- 21 sweep exception did not apply to a search of a teenage-party site after all the suspects had been “rounded up” and the officers had no concern for their safety or the safety of others
  • asking whether the officers were in “immediate . . . pursuit of a suspect from the scene of the crime” (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.