John S. Peterson v. Joseph Califano, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare for the United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judicial review is available 22 under § 405(g) only after a statutorily mandated hearing takes place (first citing Califano 23 v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99, 108 (1977), and then citing Cappadora v. Celebrezze, 356 F.2d 1, 24 4–5 (2d Cir. 1966)
• holding that AC’s denial 5 of request to extend filing period, after attorney claimed that letter from AC 6 regarding the deadline had never been received or was misfiled, was not 7 reviewable, because a “final decision ... plainly refers to a decision on the merits”
• discussing Sanders and noting that “by authorizing judicial review of a final 23 decision made ‘after a hearing,’ [the Act] referred to decisions where a hearing was 24 mandatory, not optional.”
• refusing to review order denying extension of filing period for appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).