John S. Gore v. Indiana University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that employer's hiring of a man before two women undercut \reverse\ discrimination claim
• approving defendant’s decision not to hire a plaintiff who had no basis to claim that he was more qualified than the candidates that were hired by defendant
• \The district court dismissed Gore's age discrimination claim on sovereign immunity grounds. Gore does not appeal this ruling and rightly so.\
• in light of Kimel, the district court was right to dismiss on sovereign immunity grounds plaintiff’s age discrimination claim against a university
• “[I]t is the unusual employer who discriminates against majority employees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).