Skip to main content
· 6/15/1900

John S. Brittain Dry-goods Co. v. Merkel

Citations

  • 10 Kan. App. 12
  • 61 P. 675
  • 1900 Kan. App. LEXIS 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that amendment to allege claim based on failure to fingerprint arrestee would be futile because “precedent makes clear that... a program [of immediate fingerprint comparisons for arrestees] is not constitutionally required.”
  • no due process violation arose from two-day detention and four-day detention of wrong twin brother arrested pursuant to valid warrant, over protests of the arrestee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.