John Rolwing v. Nestle Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a damages stipulation could preclude removal under CAFA
• holding that a damages stipulation could preclude removal under CAFA
• holding that a damages stipulation could preclude removal under CAFA
• holding that a damages stipulation could preclude removal under CAFA
• a precertification “binding stipulation limiting dam ages sought to an amount not exceeding $5 million can be used to defeat CAFA jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).