· 3/24/1997
John ROE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; Donna Lee; Arlo Smith, Defendants-Appellees
Citations
- 109 F.3d 578
- 97 Daily Journal DAR 3848
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2087
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 5422
- 1997 WL 129025
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a prosecutor's decision not to call a witness at trial was protected by absolute immunity
- holding that a prosecutor’s decision not to call a witness at trial was protected by absolute immunity
- holding that a prosecutor’s decision not to call a wit- ness at trial was protected by absolute immunity
- holding that “a prosecutor is entitled to absolute immunity for the decision not to prosecute”
- holding that prosecutors were entitled to absolute immunity for deciding not to prosecute an officer’s cases
- holding that speech by public employees about personnel disputes and grievances is not a matter of public concern
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leavy, Sneed, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.