John Rissman & Son v. Gordon & Ferguson, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “According to Plaintiffs, unlawful conduct is the only necessary element for UCL unlawfulness liability, unlike the fraudulent or unfairness prongs which require particularity as to reliance and injury ... This is incorrect.”
• dismissing website labeling claims because “Plaintiffs [] fail to plead that they ever saw, read, or were even aware of any website before this suit,” and therefore they could not establish reliance for purposes of their UCL, FAL, or CLRA claims
• The 14 CLRA, FAL, and UCL … are California consumer protection statutes.”
• noting “[d]efendant [wa]s 23 located in Texas”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).