John Riju v. Joslin A. Riju

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegation that bank purchased excess flood insurance at the homeowner's expense to generate commissions stated a breach of good faith claim under Massachusetts law
• holding that ambiguous contract provisions foreclose dismissal of complaint
• stating that although “damages for breach of contract and unjust enrichment are mutually exclusive . . . it is accepted practice to pursue both theories at the pleading stage”
• reversing the judgement that a claim of unjust enrichment should be dismissed based on interpretation of the express contract
• reinstating a breach of contract claim because an ambiguity in contract language meant the plaintiff's construction of the language was not properly deemed unreasonable at the motion to dismiss stage
• pointing to Gilmore as affirming a “well established principle” of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).