John Richardson v. Trenton Special School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[t]his open file approach is intended to ensure fair and just trials\
• explaining that inconsistent statements made by a confidential informant in another trial were not admissible under N.J.R.E. 608 to impeach the informant's credibility in current trial
• explaining specific instances of conduct that are relevant only as tending to prove a character trait are inadmissible to affect a witness's A-0604-18T2 22 credibility
• first quoting State in Int. of A.B., 219 N.J. 542, 554 (2014); and then quoting Pomerantz, 207 N.J. at 371
• “However expansive our discovery rule and jurisprudence may be, they do not sanction rummaging through irrelevant evidence.”
• “However expansive our discovery rule and jurisprudence may be, they do not sanction rummaging through irrelevant evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).