John Raskiewicz v. The Town of New Boston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that on a motion for summary judgment the court is “required to respect all inferences that reasonably can be drawn from the facts, but [it] cannot ignore uncontested facts that render inferences unreasonable or ... fantastic”
• upholding decision by Board of Selectmen, which had the authority to issue gravel permit, to condition permit on dismissal of developer’s state court lawsuit
• “[F]ederal courts do not sit as a super zoning board or zoning board of appeals”
• doubting federal jurisdiction over “loose claims of conspiracy and corruption”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).