John R. WALLACE v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services. Appeal of John R. WALLACE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ALJ must afford a claimant an opportunity to cross-examine the authors of any post-hearing medical reports where such cross-examination is necessary to the full presentation of the case
• noting that an opportunity for cross-examination must be provided “when an administrative law judge chooses to go outside the testimony adduced at the hearing” (emphasis added)
• claimant’s attorney objected to post-hearing reports and did not waive right to cross-examination, but this conduct must be contrasted with that of an attorney who does not object
• claimant's attorney objected to post-hearing reports and did not waive right to cross-examination, but this conduct must be contrasted with that of an attorney who does not object
• claimant’s attorney objected to post-hearing reports and did not waive right to cross-examination, but this conduct must be contrasted with that of an attorney who does not object
• interpreting Richardson for the Third Circuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).