John R. Rising-Moore v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plain- tiff’s counsel’s settlement demand could support a finding that the amount in controversy had been satisfied
• finding that plaintiff's counsel's settlement demand could support a finding that the amount in controversy had been satisfied
• noting that a settlement offer is admissible to show that the amount-in- controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction has been met
• finding that plain- tiff’s counsel’s settlement demand could support a finding that the amount in controversy had been satisfied
• finding that medical expenses and lost earnings of $45,000 with a “modest allowance for pain, suffering, and future losses ... brings the total over the threshold”
• finding post-removal settlement demand “implies that the stakes at trial comfortably exceed the [jurisdictional] minimum”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).