John R. Glenn v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that consolidation of the case with the appeal pending before the board would be convenient for the parties
• finding that section 609(d) does not include a 90-day limit
• recommending transfer and consolidation with an ASBCA claim under a predecessor statute despite the fact that the case had been brought in the Court of Federal Claims outside of the 90-day time limitation at the ASBCA
• plaintiff that appealed contracting officer’s liability decision before agency board could not appeal the contracting officer’s subsequent quantum decision in the Court of Federal Claims
• “Because Glenn was not required to certify his $31,500 claim before the [Contracting Officer], he need not have certified the $66,570.32 resulting from the denial of his initial claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).