Skip to main content
· 2/10/2023

John Phillip Bender v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that the creation of unauthorized recordings of “images or sound occurring within an employer’s premises” as part of undercover investigations conducted by PETA to publicize animal cruelty was not speech protected by the First Amendment
  • “[S]cores of Supreme Court and circuit cases apply the First Amendment to safeguard the right to gather information as a predicate to speech.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.