John Paul Mitchell Systems v. Pete-N-Larry's Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs' claim failed to show “inducement” even though defendants 13 knew the only way they could obtain plaintiffs’ products was for someone in plaintiffs’ distribution network to be in breach of its contract with plaintiff
• codes crudely chiseled off bottles caused punctures that might lead to contamination
• codes crudely chiseled off the bottles caused punctures that might lead to contamination
• where the court noted that it could not be said that Paul Mitchell products with obliterated codes were genuine as a matter of law in view of the physical change the obliteration had worked on the bottles, the information printed thereon, and the liquid contained therein

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).